Even polarisation is obedient
A SERIES ON IDEOLOGY 2011-2021
>>EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THESIS<< REALITY CHECK
Evidence indicates that even erratic polarisation in media conforms to the demands of those in power. Categorical claims of left-wing…
ON METHOD
This scheme deals with configurations of unknown complexity. Moreover, the algorithm allows for arbitrary or inconsistent rules. In the end…
Information Production Theory: Palestine in Ruins and in Mass Media
There are two sets of seemingly irreconcilable results indicating a fundamental problem in the social sciences and humanities. Previous research…
Footnotes on the Figures of Suppression – Footnote 1
As a rule of thumb, it was far more likely for a person 2011-2016 to suffer severe trauma as a…
WIKILEAKS’ UNFORGIVABLE LIBERALISM
One of the more spectacular findings is the prevalence of fact-resistant behavior among journalist and experts. Associated bias gave rise…
On the Limits of Nonprofit Firms
Surveillance, hierarchy and bureaucracy emerge as a consequence of strategic interaction e.g. local competition over one source. Wealthy or ‘small’ organizations can afford…
I scrutinised world-renowned theorist and left-wing profile David Graeber, in order to assess left-wing bias in academia … he can be regarded as a fraud, in the sense that he makes pop-cultural references to Marx, Marxists and the left, but dismisses them in all important respects …his theory is flawed on nearly all key points.
RELATED
Research shows that even polarization in media is obedient in service of those in power. But what are the modes of manipulation and control beyond rhetoric in text?
Highlights: (1) Journalists present one set of articles as history unfolds, and one set for future historical record: – Detected even in a respected research database (2) Janus-faced political outlook: – reputation of being left-leaning, but with hawkish right-wing stance on key issues which define political affiliation. (3) Extreme-right allegations of left-wing bias support hawkishness in journalism: – It is not mainly about discipline through flak, but to disguise and maintain the façade under false flag. (4) A famous left-wing academic can be regarded as a public-relations gimmick. (5) Swedish academia is often singled out as a politically-correct leftist entity. Still, the biggest academic online-forum is filled with far-right propaganda. I was censored and subsequently banned after communicating (4).
What caused my expulsion? Evidence indicating that the so-called left-wing bias does not exist, and rather is about frauds at the highest level
THE DIGITAL SPECTRE OF MEDIA IMPERIALISM
There is something rotten with the adjustments of Swedish Television.
Prestigious Academic Online Community – Comfy with the Far Right – Censors Divergent Opinion
I joined a couple of months ago. Soon I noticed that a worrying amount of contributions were narratives about so-called identity activists, and left-wing supporters, who allegedly pressure researchers in order to advance their agendas. For instance, ‘Islamo-leftism’ recently received attention. I am not an opinion police, but the tone is recognisable from the right…
The Bullshit Conspiracy.
It is as if different persons wrote Bullshit Jobs (Graeber, 2019), but failed to communicate properly. Vintage smash-and-grab of work from leftists who are not themselves impostors. I develop an alternative and discuss a theory of society in view of constructive criticism of economics.
The first two focuses on a Swedish academic online-community and Television. Why bother? – Swedish Television is highly relevant because it is frequently taken for granted that it is leftist. However, as research shows, categorical claims of left-wing bias in Swedish public service are inconsistent with data. Similar categorical allegations are frequently made about Swedish academia. Especially concerning political correctness.
Power/You 